... is: it is a virus, produced by nature (trees and plants, etc) that takes revenge on mankind, that spreads over the air and causes people to k*ll themselves. The fleeing family survives because wind blows the virus/poison produced by plants away. At the end however the same "happening" appears in France also.
That's it.
And the director Shyamalan should understand that now is era of the Internet and spoilers are revealed on the Internet. He makes movies that have only one advantage: a twist at the end that turns around things. This means that instead of having filmmaking talent he is just building to the twist and then reveals it. Very lame if you ask me and not usable anymore in the era of the Internet.
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
you are boring
well thx for lettin me know even though i wasnt going to pay to see this. all his movies are a waste and turn out to be some stupid plot anyway.
good point thats how i feel about that hack called hitchcock, your an idiot, I don't even like the guy but he is a good story teller and a better director than some flavor of the month douchebag that you suck off constantly
Thanks I wasn't sure if I should go see that movies but now I know how disappointing it is I won't waste my time. The guy made one good movies and now all he do is 2 hours crap with one twist, how about working on more then just the twist ?
A F%^$ing movie about how angry the plants are at the people?????? Really?
Thanks for saving me the cash. Between the tix and the popcorn and the soda and the parking...ugh. You saved me $50usd, at least.
Thanks, man.
My first thoughts about seeing the commercials with mass suicides was that people had seen previews for "Living Lohan," had taken that as a sign that The Apocalypse was coming, and decided to off themselves before all hell broke loose. After hearing the plot twist, I think my idea is more believable.
not cool. you lied. that's totally NOT how it ended.
"good point thats how i feel about that hack called hitchcock, your an idiot, I don't even like the guy but he is a good story teller and a better director than some flavor of the month douchebag that you suck off constantly"
If you are going to insult someone by calling them an idiot you should spell it correctly. It's you're as in you are, not your. I think you're a douche.
Thanks for posting the spoiler. You saved me from spending any money to entertain my very slight interest in this film. - Lisa
um, thats not even true.
the ending is not that at all.
why would you say that?
ok, i have corrected the ending to reflect what happened. sorry for mistake.
I don't even know why "The Sixth Sense" was a hit; I thought Bruce Willis' character was dead all along, and since the kid could see ghosts, why was it a big surprise when Willis' character turned out to be another ghost? Boooring.
In response to:
I don't even know why "The Sixth Sense" was a hit; I thought Bruce Willis' character was dead all along, and since the kid could see ghosts, why was it a big surprise when Willis' character turned out to be another ghost? Boooring.
Well my goodness. Someone should give you a round of applause for being so clever. I'm being sarcastic, by the way. But of course, you already knew that (nothing gets past you, right?)
Post a Comment